The King James Bible (KJB or KJV), also called Authorized version is by far the best, most accurate, reliable Bible.
It was first published in 1611. But the word spellings have been modernized since then.
This is about 250 years before the tsunami of intellectual polluted thinking that was loosed by Darwinism or Evolution starting about 1859.
1. The King James translators believed the Bible is correct, that this world is about 6000 years old, that is, from God's Special Creation act.
They HAD this mindset when they did their translation of what they believed was God's book, the Bible.
2. They use the Traditional New Testament manuscripts, NOT the Critical New Testament manuscripts, as modern translators do.
Modern translators are obliged to use the Critical text.
This makes considerable difference.
The Traditional viewpoint correctly assumes God has providentially brought the Bible down to us. The Critical viewpoint foolishly says, it it just archeological luck we found the Bible.
Again, modern translators are likely to have the MINDSET that this world evolved billions of years ago BECAUSE THIS IS OVERWELMINGLY THE MODERN ACADEMIC BELIEF. IF THIS WERE TRUE, THE BIBLE IS OBVIOUSLY BADLY WRONG. I AM SURE THAT ALL BIBLE AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE IS THAT THIS WORLD WAS CREATED ABOUT 6000 YEARS AGO. THUS, WHICH BELIEF THE TRANSLATOR HOLDS IS IMMENSLY CRITICAL IN HOW HE OR SHE TRANSLATES.
3. Furthermore, 1611 was in the era called the Golden Age of Literature. Excellence in literature was the RULE!
4. Furthermore, it was the era of the Protestant Reformation. Correct doctrine was much more, in force.
So these four factors make the King James translation much more reliable than modern translations.
The so-called problem of archaic words is really easily manageable.
I EMPHASIS THAT THE KJV TRANSLATORS HAD A VASTLY BETTER, RIGHT, AND SUPERIOR MINDSET FROM MODERN TRANSLATORS. THIS MAKES A HUGE AND CRITICAL DIFFERENCE. IT IS SEEN IN THE CUMULATIVE IMPACT AS WELL AS IN SPECIFIC VERSES.