The King James Bible (KJB) was born of a very different mind set or mentality from modern bibles.  The King James Bible predates the Darwinian - evolution revolution by about 250 years. 

The term revolution correctly notes the HUGE paradigm shift that occurred between about 1870 to 1920 and profoundly altered the way academic people and people in general understand this world.

I contend, it profoundly affected the way Bible translators, translate.

I understand the great scientist Isaac Newton determined creation to have occurred in 4000BC, the astronomer Johann Kepler determined it to be 3992BC, and the great scholar Bible scholar Bishop James Ussher determined it to be 4004BC. 

These all confidently understood the Bible to be actually TRUE!  TRUTH!

I contend modern scholars are very very likely to believe the Bible chronology to be very very wrong and the modern science-so-called view of billions and billions of years of evolutionary history - to be the true viewpoint.

I urgently contend this monstous viewpoint difference abosolutely does greatly effect the way modern bible translators render bible passages.

ALL old-cosmos dating methods have many unprovable assumptions.

See my Bible proof page for two HUGE internal proofs the Bible stands on very reliable, solid grounds.


The King James Bible (KJB) was born of a very different mind set or mentality from modern bibles.

The King James Bible predates the Darwinian - evolution revolution by about 250 years.

The term revolution correctly notes the HUGE paradigm shift that occurred between about 1870 to 1920 and profoundly altered the way academic people and people in general understand this world.

I contend, it profoundly affecks the way Bible translators, translate.

I understand the great scientist Isaac Newton determined creation to have occurred in 4000BC, the astronomer Johann Kepler determined it to be 3992BC, and the great scholar Bible scholar Bishop James Ussher determined it to be 4004BC.

These all confidently understood the Bible to be actually TRUE! TRUTH!

I contend modern scholars are very very likely to believe the Bible chronology to be very very wrong and the modern science-so-called view of billions and billions of years of evolutionary history - to be the true viewpoint.

I urgently contend this monstrous viewpoint difference absolutely does greatly affect the way modern bible translators render bible passages.

ALL old-cosmos dating methods have many unprovable assumptions. 

At Ken Ham's Answers in Genesis web site one can find many reasons to see that this world is young.  Age of the Earth Topic | Answers in Genesis.

Also see his page - The 10 Best Evidences from Science that Confirm a Young Earth for many evidences and arguments for a  young earth.

The King James Bible (KJB or KJV), also called Authorized version is by far the best, most accurate, reliable Bible.  

It was first published in 1611.  But the word spellings have been modernized since then.

This is about 250 years before the tsunami of intellectual polluted thinking that was loosed by Darwinism or Evolution starting about 1859.

1.  The King James translators believed the Bible is correct, that this world is about 6000 years old, that is, from God's Special Creation act.

They HAD this mindset when they did their translation of what they believed was God's book, the Bible.

2.  They use the Traditional New Testament manuscripts, NOT the Critical New Testament manuscripts, as modern translators do.

Modern translators are obliged to use the Critical text.

This makes considerable difference.

The Traditional viewpoint correctly assumes God has providentially brought the Bible down to us.   The Critical viewpoint foolishly says, it it just archeological luck we found the Bible.

Again, modern translators are likely to have the MINDSET that this world evolved billions of years ago BECAUSE THIS IS OVERWELMINGLY THE MODERN ACADEMIC BELIEF.  IF THIS WERE TRUE, THE BIBLE IS OBVIOUSLY BADLY WRONG.   I AM SURE THAT ALL BIBLE AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE IS THAT THIS WORLD WAS CREATED ABOUT 6000 YEARS AGO.   THUS, WHICH BELIEF THE TRANSLATOR HOLDS IS IMMENSLY CRITICAL IN HOW HE OR SHE TRANSLATES.

3.  Furthermore, 1611 was in the era called the Golden Age of Literature.   Excellence in literature was the RULE!

4.  Furthermore, it was the era of the Protestant Reformation.   Correct doctrine was much more, in force.

So these four factors make the King James translation much more reliable than modern translations.

The so-called problem of archaic words is really easily manageable.

I EMPHASIS THAT THE KJV TRANSLATORS HAD A VASTLY BETTER, RIGHT, AND SUPERIOR MINDSET FROM MODERN TRANSLATORS.  THIS MAKES A HUGE AND CRITICAL DIFFERENCE.  IT IS SEEN IN THE CUMULATIVE IMPACT AS WELL AS IN SPECIFIC VERSES.